Identify stereotypes that you have of other groups
or individuals (and their positions).

We all use stereotypes. To make sense of the world, we create shortcuts based on our past experiences to make day-to-day living a bit easier. If we had to evaluate each and every person and each and every situation based on their unique characteristics, we would be evaluating each and every minute of our lives!!

In social relationships, one positive aspect of stereotyping is that it is economical. For example, we don't need to meet and evaluate each and every white supremacist to realize that we probably would not get along with someone who is a white supremacist. One negative aspect is that we often mischaracterize other groups or individuals. Particular groups may draw certain types or kinds of people with particular sets of worldviews, but that does not necessarily mean that they are bad people, are fanatic about their views, cannot be reasoned with, or that they could not possibly share some common beliefs or interests with us. Two benefits of a stereotype are that: 1) we can realize that we hold a stereotype about a particular person or group, and 2) that stereotype can be examined and reevaluated.

Stereotypes about particular groups may feature our perceptions of how others frame dispute situations. Flawed perceptions or misunderstandings of others' frames are likely, however, because we may not have taken the time necessary to evaluate the group and its members thoroughly. Here is an exercise to help you better understand the frames of other groups.

Think of a group with which you may be in conflict (this can be a social group, an interest group, a religious group, or a cultural group).

  • Identify your feelings about the group:
    • What are its members like?
    • What types of individuals belong to the group?
    • What kinds of arguments do the group's members make in the context of this conflict?

Think of members of the group that do not fit the characteristics that you outlined above.

  • Can you think of cases or places where individuals do not adhere to these descriptions of them?
  • Do all members necessarily share the same views, values, or feel as strongly about the same arguments?
  • Can you find any common characteristics, interests, or beliefs that you share with these individuals?

If possible, try to meet and get to know, or even interview a member of the opposing group.

  • Did they fit the stereotype that you had of them?

Often, the stereotypes that we have of particular groups create frames for us. They frame how we see and interpret the arguments and positions of other groups, and how we think about their frames. Often, our own frames prevent us from clearly understanding the frames that other groups use to see the dispute.

Now that you have completed these exercises, you are ready to begin thinking about understanding your own frames.

 


Also available: General Environmental Dispute Simulation

Copyright © 2003-2005 Environmental Framing Consortium

Please send comments and questions to


More detailed information, training opportunities, and information about our book,
Making Sense of Intractable Environmental Conflicts
, is available from the Consortium.